IMC/Confluence writer's meeting
We need writers!
Thursday, Dec. 4 7:30 PM CAMP 3026 Cherokee @ Minnesota in south St. Louis
|
|
|
IMC/Confluence writer's meeting We need writers! Thursday, Dec. 4 7:30 PM CAMP 3026 Cherokee @ Minnesota in south St. LouisRecent blog postsTopic ListFree TaggingNavigation |
AT&T Whistleblower Talks about Retroactive Immunity (Why It's Bad)Yesterday (prez candidate) Chris Dodd sat down with AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein. He’s the technician who revealed that the NSA has secret rooms for sweeping up massive amounts of electronic communications on the internet. AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein Klein is calling on the Senate to not grant telecommunications companies retroactive immunity. He's also testifying to the scale of the Bush administration's electronic surveillance: "Everything you could imagine you use the internet for flows through these cables. It's not only international traffic, but a huge amount of domestic traffic too." Watch the video of Klein talking about why he opposes retroactive immunity. VIDEO TRANSCRIPT My name is Mark Klein. I used to be an AT&T technician for 22 years. [Former AT&T Technician Mark Klein Speaks Out on Retroactive Immunity and Domestic Surveillance] "What I figured out when I got there is that they were copying everything flowing across the internet cables, the major internet links between AT&T's network and other companies' networks." "It struck me at the time that this was a massively unconstitutional, illegal operation." "It affects not only AT&T's customers, but everybody because these links went to places link Sprint, Qwest, a whole bunch of other companies." "And so they're basically tapping into the entire internet." [But isn't the government only monitoring suspected terrorists and not ordinary Americans?] "To perform what they say they want to do, which is look at international traffic, none of this makes any sense. These installations only make sense if they're doing a huge, massive domestic dragnet on everybody in the United States." [Shouldn't the telecoms trust that the Bush administration's requests are legal?] "These companies know very well what's legal and illegal. They've been dealing with this for decades. And it's a fact that Qwest refused the NSA's approaches because they didn't have, they weren't shown any legal justification for it. And they did the right thing and said, "no." " "What I'm here for is it looked like a few weeks ago that the Senate bill which passed the Intelligence Committee would give immunity to the telecom companies and that would probably put an end to the lawsuits." [The Senate Judiciary Committee is currently reviewing retroactive immunity] "So I came here to lobby against giving immunity to the telecom companies. Let the court cases proceed and Congress should not interfere in that." [Tell the Senate to oppose telecom immunity http://chrisdodd.com/immunity] Linkshttp://chrisdodd.com/immunity LicenseLicense Option: |
This story has now appeared
This story has now appeared elsewhere:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/09/2040206
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/11/08/countdown-att-whistleblower-spe...
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3833172&page=1
Likewise, Mark Klein's statement, related evidence in an EFF suit, along with pix of the purported "secret room" at the AT&T San Fransisco facility, were published in 2006.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70621
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/05/70908
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/05/70914
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/multimedia/2006/05/70944
Several folks have suggested Mr. Klein is a fraud intending to kill the entire story about AT&T wiretapping once his deception is revealed. Caveat emptor.
Here in STL, AT&T controls phone and DSL internet service, which includes most public/coffeehouse wifi. You can deter such eavesdropping by encrypting the online traffic that you care about.
For Web, make sure to use SSL encryption, i.e. look for https:// instead of http:// in the beginning the URL.
For sending mail from a proram like Thunderbird (i.e. not webmail), try to enable encryption on your outgoing SMTP server. This is usually done with SSL or TLS encryption.
For IRC, try to use IRC channels that support SSL encryption, although these are not common.
Riseup.net, for example, supports SSL encryption on webmail:
https://mail.riseup.net
For mail clients, here are some instructions:
http://help.riseup.net/mail/mail-clients/
If you're *really* concerned about your email, then consider using PGP encryption on the email contents itself. The SSL and TLS thingies mentioned above only encrypt the connections over which web/mail travels.